In the News
State lab still behind on DNA testing: But is no longer focused on reducing
backlog
By Brian R. Ballou
Boston Globe Staff
November 27, 2009
Thirteen years after Manson Brown allegedly pushed through a window
of a home on Franklin Street in Cambridge, raped a woman, and disappeared
into the night, he was indicted last week for the crime.
He could have been tied to the assault years ago - police took a sample
of his blood in 2005, after he was convicted in a home invasion in Brookline
- but authorities were so far behind in testing samples that cases like
Brown’s languished, and victims, advocates say, were left waiting
for closure.
The case, authorities say, illustrates the importance of DNA evidence
as a crime-fighting tool, but it also demonstrates how justice can be
delayed.
“You have shows like ‘Law and Order’ and ‘CSI,’
where cases are discovered and solved within an hour, but in real life,
sadly, budgetary and other issues can really slow the process of justice,’’
said Toni Troop, spokeswoman for Jane Doe Inc., a statewide coalition
that advocates on behalf of victims of sexual assault.
Two years ago, the State Police Crime Lab came under scrutiny after
a state-ordered investigation revealed that more than 16,000 DNA samples,
some dating back to the 1980s, were stacked in cold storage and had
not been analyzed. That backlog, characterized by the state to be of
“crisis proportions,’’ led to the firing or resignation
of three lab employees, including the administrator and director.
In a shift, the lab, located in Maynard, no longer is focused on reducing
that backlog to zero, officials said.
Since 2007, only 500 samples have been tested from the 16,000. Those
samples - many of them connected to homicides and other deaths, sexual
assaults, and property crimes - were tested only because district attorneys
requested that they be analyzed. If no requests are made, the samples
remain in cold storage.
If the statute of limitations is encroaching on a case, the lab will
unilaterally analyze certain samples, said John Grossman, the Department
of Public Safety’s undersecretary of forensic science and technology.
“We are exercising triage, working with the various district attorneys’
offices,’’ Grossman said. “When the requests come
in, we analyze; otherwise, most of those 16,000 samples will remain
in cold storage.’’
Many of those 16,000 involve property crimes, motor vehicle incidents,
and assaults.
The highest priority now is testing the newest samples. There are about
3,000 crime scene DNA samples and about 3,500 DNA samples from felons
that need to be entered into the federal Combined DNA Index System,
or CODIS. The lab can complete 80 to 110 such analyses a month.
Analyzing DNA, a complicated process, can take days or months, depending
on the purity of the sample and the urgency of the investigation.
Backlogs are a nationwide problem. The federal government, through its
DNA Backlog Reduction Act, has earmarked about $151 million from this
year through 2014 to reduce backlogs. This year, Massachusetts received
$1.2 million, most of which went to the State Police Crime Lab.
Michael Sheppo, director of the Office of Investigative and Forensic
Sciences for the National Institute of Justice, said the demand for
DNA testing far surpasses the capacity for labs to do such testing.
“We are getting a very educated group of police professionals
who know how to collect evidence,’’ he said. “And
because of the ‘CSI effect,’ more emphasis is being placed
on DNA evidence; in the courts, people expect to hear something dealing
with DNA evidence.’’
Renewed interest in long-unsolved “cold’’ cases and
in postconviction testing, when inmates seek DNA analyses in an effort
to overturn their convictions, also put pressure on testing labs, Sheppo
said.
Sometimes a police department will request a speedy test because a suspect
is a flight risk or there are other extenuating circumstances.
Everett police made such a request in October, after a woman was found
stabbed to death on her doorstep. A former boyfriend, a native of Brazil,
was later charged.
Eventually, better technology will cut the backlogs, Sheppo said. “Certainly,
through new instrumentation and robotics they are going to be able to
do this quicker,’’ he said.
© Copyright 2009 The New York Times Company